Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4265 14
Original file (NR4265 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIC
Docket No. NR4265-14
17 Mar 15

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

16 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
accordance with Commander, Navy Personnel Command message dated 28 May
2013, you were rated at 10% disabled, and were to be separated with
disability severance pay. Furthermore, you were frocked to E4 prior
‘to separation, discharged on 13 June 2013, and authorized disability
severance pay in the amount of $11,878.28, per DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty/Evaluation
report & Counseling Record). However, in accordance with your
request, you were only paid $10,724.40, after taxes. Nevertheless,
DOD Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, Chapter 35, 350404 (26
U.S.C. 104/St. Clair v. U.S. 778 F. Supp 894), states the following:
“Disability severance pay is normally taxable income. It is not
subject to tax withholding or reporting, however, if at least one of
the following three conditions exists: 1. On September 24, 1975, the
individual was either a member of a Uniformed Service or was under a
binding written commitment to become a member. 2. The entitlement
resulted from combat-related injury or illness, as determined by the
Secretary of the Military Service concerned (or designee), which
happens as a result of any of the following activities: a. As a direct
result of armed conflict. b. While actually performing extra-
hazardous service, even if the service does not directly involve
Docket No. NR4265-14

combat. ¢. Under conditions simulating war, including maneuvers or
training. d. By an instrumentality of war, such as weapons, 3. The
member has official notification from the VA approving entitlement to
disability compensation for the same illness or injury that caused the
entitlement to disability severance pay.” The Board found no evidence
that your meet any of the above exceptions. Accordingly, your.
application and your request for a personal appearance before the
Board have been denied. The names and votes of the members of the

panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
‘not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision.in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of

probable material error or injustice.

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087505C070212

    Original file (2003087505C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Reconsideration of his request to correct item 10 on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings) to show that his disability resulted from an injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict. The 10 July 1973 version of the VA Presumptions/Approved Codes listing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022347

    Original file (20120022347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PEB stated that the applicant's PTSD was a result of a mortar attack in Iraq. Qualified military retirees must be an active duty or Reserve retiree with 20 or more years of creditable service or a Title 10 USC Chapter 61 medically retiree, be receiving military retired pay, have a 10 percent or greater VA rating for a combat related injury, and have their military retired pay reduced by receipt...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005833

    Original file (20150005833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Although his records contain several Standard Forms 600 containing references to PTSD, his MEB NARSUM lists a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011593

    Original file (20100011593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her retirement orders to show the following entries as "Yes" instead of "No": a. Her records also show she served in Kuwait from 13 January 2003 to 16 May 2003. The applicant's DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) contains the following entries in Item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): * The Soldier’s retirement is not based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006656

    Original file (20140006656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his request is based on major depressive disorder (not bipolar disorder, which the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) considered and denied in his original application). The Gulf War Illness and the Health of Gulf War Veterans, Findings in Brief, that the applicant provided in his original application was reviewed. The evidence of record shows the applicant requested correction of his records to show his disabilities are combat-related and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011013

    Original file (20060011013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). These kinds of events produce stress in anyone, but not everyone develops PTSD. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020791

    Original file (20130020791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies his accident report, 45 pages of medical records, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharged from Active Duty), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability evaluation, a Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR), CRSC application and denied, CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02675-05

    Original file (02675-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, Enclosure DEPARTI~NT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION BRANCH 201 12TH STREET SUITE 703 ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4357 iN REPLY REFER 10 1850/I CRSC 15 Mar 2005 Subj: APPROVAL OF CRSC UPON RECONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF~E~ qflUIIgIpUUIqqU~MUJP~4~ USN DOCKET NUMBER NCO4—00680 Ref: (a) 10 U.S. Code 1413a End: (1) DD Form 149 Application for Correction of Military Record 1. Your application package does not establish that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006358C070206

    Original file (20050006358C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Thus, one Gulf War veteran presenting with difficult-to-diagnose symptoms could be diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, which cannot be service-connected under this law because it is a diagnosis. While the applicant has five disabilities which have been classified as Gulf War incurred, there is no evidence or indication that those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017427

    Original file (20140017427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested the ABCMR reconsider his previous request and provided a document entitled Combat Action Badge Information. When a Solder has been awarded a Combat Action Badge, it may help make a determination for CRSC but only if that person is later diagnosed with PTSD as a direct result of the incident for which the award was given. Second, other veterans, those who were awarded CRSC, first had conditions that were rated by VA with a 10% or greater disability rating, and then...